Architectures of Emergency / ALICE
Architectures of Emergency
Sentinel Attentions and Relational Governance in a Rapidly Changing World
We are living in an age increasingly shaped by a continuous and constructed condition of emergency. Climate disruption, systemic inequality, forced displacement, and ecological degradation are not anomalies but interwoven dynamics that define the present. Emergency has become foundational—an organizing framework that governs how we perceive, inhabit, and respond to a changing world. Architectures of Emergency examines how emergency is not only managed but actively constructed—with the complicity of architecture, urbanism, and design—as it is sensed, spatialized, and institutionalized across scales.
Contemporary governance often frames emergencies as isolated, urgent events to be managed through technocratic control. Such framings obscure the slow violence, uneven vulnerabilities, and embodied knowledge that shape how emergencies are lived and remembered. Emergency becomes a tool of abstraction, implemented through protocols, command centers, and anticipatory infrastructures that seek to restore normative “order.” Architecture, in this system, risks becoming a passive executor of global scripts—producing climate-smart bunkers, resilient masterplans, and securitized zones devoid of care, memory, or participation.
This thesis draws from experiences in which architecture works otherwise—becoming relation and care: a practice that empowers communities through situated knowledges, shared vulnerabilities, and collective attunements. It opens space for slower gestures and alternative imaginaries for living with disturbance.
The thesis unfolds in two movements. The first, The Intrusion of Emergency, traces a genealogy of architectures of emergency—laws, command centers, infrastructures, and protocols—that institutionalize emergency as a spatial regime. The second, Becoming-Emergency, invites us to recompose these architectures through feminist figurations, sentinel attentions, and ecologies of care—toward softer, situated, and collective forms of spatial practice.
The research is grounded in territories I have inhabited before and during the thesis—Murcia (Spain), Geneva (Switzerland), Brooklyn (USA), and Maroantsetra (Madagascar)—shaped by lived encounters with flooding, risk infrastructures, and activist counter-practices. These situated engagements inform a broader framework: the Atlas of Inhabiting Emergency, a collective cartographic methodology that traces shared vulnerabilities, spatial resonances, and practices of care across geographies. Together, they form the foundation for a transdisciplinary methodology grounded in place, perception, and cohabitation.
Unfolding as both a cartographic and choreographic inquiry, this research traces how infrastructures, bodies, and imaginaries navigate and are shaped by emergency. Through genealogical analysis and experimental design rituals, it shows how alternative architectures surface in the fissures of emergency governance—architectures that attune rather than surveil, and that govern through relation rather than control.
Ultimately, this research argues for a shift: from emergency as spectacle to emergency as method; from containment to cohabitation; from resilience to relational survival. It explores an open-ended spatial, political and ethical practice for staying with the trouble of our time—a time shaped by emergency.
Sentinel Attentions and Relational Governance in a Rapidly Changing World
We are living in an age increasingly shaped by a continuous and constructed condition of emergency. Climate disruption, systemic inequality, forced displacement, and ecological degradation are not anomalies but interwoven dynamics that define the present. Emergency has become foundational—an organizing framework that governs how we perceive, inhabit, and respond to a changing world. Architectures of Emergency examines how emergency is not only managed but actively constructed—with the complicity of architecture, urbanism, and design—as it is sensed, spatialized, and institutionalized across scales.
Contemporary governance often frames emergencies as isolated, urgent events to be managed through technocratic control. Such framings obscure the slow violence, uneven vulnerabilities, and embodied knowledge that shape how emergencies are lived and remembered. Emergency becomes a tool of abstraction, implemented through protocols, command centers, and anticipatory infrastructures that seek to restore normative “order.” Architecture, in this system, risks becoming a passive executor of global scripts—producing climate-smart bunkers, resilient masterplans, and securitized zones devoid of care, memory, or participation.
This thesis draws from experiences in which architecture works otherwise—becoming relation and care: a practice that empowers communities through situated knowledges, shared vulnerabilities, and collective attunements. It opens space for slower gestures and alternative imaginaries for living with disturbance.
The thesis unfolds in two movements. The first, The Intrusion of Emergency, traces a genealogy of architectures of emergency—laws, command centers, infrastructures, and protocols—that institutionalize emergency as a spatial regime. The second, Becoming-Emergency, invites us to recompose these architectures through feminist figurations, sentinel attentions, and ecologies of care—toward softer, situated, and collective forms of spatial practice.
The research is grounded in territories I have inhabited before and during the thesis—Murcia (Spain), Geneva (Switzerland), Brooklyn (USA), and Maroantsetra (Madagascar)—shaped by lived encounters with flooding, risk infrastructures, and activist counter-practices. These situated engagements inform a broader framework: the Atlas of Inhabiting Emergency, a collective cartographic methodology that traces shared vulnerabilities, spatial resonances, and practices of care across geographies. Together, they form the foundation for a transdisciplinary methodology grounded in place, perception, and cohabitation.
Unfolding as both a cartographic and choreographic inquiry, this research traces how infrastructures, bodies, and imaginaries navigate and are shaped by emergency. Through genealogical analysis and experimental design rituals, it shows how alternative architectures surface in the fissures of emergency governance—architectures that attune rather than surveil, and that govern through relation rather than control.
Ultimately, this research argues for a shift: from emergency as spectacle to emergency as method; from containment to cohabitation; from resilience to relational survival. It explores an open-ended spatial, political and ethical practice for staying with the trouble of our time—a time shaped by emergency.
Practical information
- Informed public
- Free
Contact
- Roxane Le Grelle: [email protected]