CECAM Workshop: "Open Databases Integration for Materials Design"
You can apply to participate and find all the relevant information (speakers, abstracts, program,...) on the event website: https://www.cecam.org/workshop-details/1208
Trial-and-error is the traditional approach to design bespoke materials for specific applications. Typically, researchers use their intuition and experience to propose compounds that are then synthesized and tested to ascertain whether or not they fulfill the target properties. It usually takes months to test a single compound, and most often the outcome is negative so many cycles of trial and improvement are required to finalize the material. The typical research project is therefore complex, time-consuming, and costly. In a speech on June 24, 2011, President Obama announced the Materials Genome Initiative, as a major US research priority to foster innovation more effectively.
The last decade has witnessed game changing improvements in materials design. The exponential growth of computer power and the development of robust first-principles electronic structure codes make it possible to perform large sets of calculations automatically. This has provided a launchpad for the flourishing field of high-throughput (HT) ab initio computations [1,2]. The concept is simple yet powerful. The results of HT calculations are curated in large databases (DBs), recording the computed properties of existing and hypothetical materials. These DBs can then be screened for materials with the desired properties, removing the guesswork from materials design. Furthermore, these DBs can be used to build machine learning models that can design materials. Thanks to such HT calculations, many open-domain DBs have emerged. In parallel, the experimental community has also continued to develop its own DBs with material properties [3,4,5,6,7,8]. In the latter case, some of the DBs are open (e.g., at the National Institute of Standards and Technology) whilst others are marketed by companies. Given the number of available materials DBs, it is impossible to be exhaustive but some initiatives provide links to as many as possible (see e.g., Refs.  and ).
Nonetheless, the landscape in materials DBs is fragmented. In some cases, a Representational State Transfer (REST) Application Program Interface (API) is available [11,12,13] to interrogate the DB through scripts (though not always documented). But, until recently, it was only possible to interrogate one DB at a time and the APIs would vary from one DB to another. Furthermore, the lack of standards makes it complicated to access large-scale curated materials data. Flexible, uniform, computer-readable data standards should be established to enable data to be shared and systematically mined.
To take advantage of the disparate databases, the OPTIMADE consortium  was formed with the goal to create a holistic API that can access all materials databases. The consortium has gathered the developers/maintainers of the following DBs:
- AFLOW distributed materials property repository: http://aflow.org
- ChemDataExtractor in Cambridge: http://chemdataextractor.org
- Materials Cloud: http://materialscloud.org
- Materials Project: http://materialsproject.org
- NOMAD (Novel Materials Discovery) Archive: https://nomad-lab.eu/prod/rae/gui/search
- Open Quantum Materials Database: http://oqmd.org
- Computational Materials Repository: http://cmr.fysik.dtu.dk
- Open Materials Database: http://openmaterialsdb.se
- Crystallography Open Database: http://www.crystallography.net/cod
A paper about the API was recently published in the prestigious peer reviewed journal Nature Scientific Data , which should act as a launchpad for future adoption and usage of the API. Furthermore, a website has been set up  with a mailing list, a wiki, and a GitHub repository. Optimade-python-tools  have been developed and released as the reference implementation for python servers, lowering the barrier to new OPTIMADE adopters. A few tutorials have also been organized online [19,20].
This CECAM event will consist of both a tutorial and a workshop. The tutorial will be mainly online, but participants who would like to participate onsite are more than welcome. They can even stay for the rest of the workshop, and any participants implementing OPTIMADE for their own databases will be strongly encouraged to stay on to accelerate the adoption of OPTIMADE. For the workshop, onsite participation is strongly suggested though online attendance will be possible but without any guarantee on the experience.
For the tutorial, the participants will be asked to go through a series of videos before the meeting itself. After a Q&A session on the videos, the ﬁrst hands-on session will comprise exercises about generating OPTIMADE queries (that can be used on all databases), and about different tools for querying the databases. During the second hands-on session, the tutees choose between three options. They can continue the exercises about querying the databases. Alternatively, they can study how to implement an OPTIMADE client for an existing database. Finally, if they have a speciﬁc problem of their own that can be dealt with using OPTIMADE, the developers can help them to address it. The tutees will continue to work during the second day (with the tutors available at speciﬁc moments). The tutorial will end on the morning of the third day after short elevator pitches by the tutees during which they will present their achievements.
The workshop will be dedicated to the further development of the OPTIMADE API.
 S. Curtarolo, G. Hart, M. Nardelli, N. Mingo, S. Sanvito, O. Levy, Nature. Mater., 12, 191-201 (2013)
 N. Marzari, Nature. Mater., 15, 381-382 (2016)
 L. Green, American Journal of Physics, 35, 291-292 (1967)
 A. Belsky, M. Hellenbrandt, V. Karen, P. Luksch, Acta. Crystallogr. Sect. B., 58, 364-369 (2002)
 P. Villars, M. Berndt, K. Brandenburg, K. Cenzual, J. Daams, F. Hulliger, T. Massalski, H. Okamoto, K. Osaki, A. Prince, H. Putz, S. Iwata, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 367, 293-297 (2004)
 S. Gražulis, D. Chateigner, R. Downs, A. Yokochi, M. Quirós, L. Lutterotti, E. Manakova, J. Butkus, P. Moeck, A. Le Bail, J. Appl. Cryst., 42, 726-729 (2009)
 Y. Xu, M. Yamazaki, P. Villars, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 50, 11RH02 (2011)
 A. Zakutayev, N. Wunder, M. Schwarting, J. Perkins, R. White, K. Munch, W. Tumas, C. Phillips, Sci. Data., 5, 180053 (2018)
 R. Taylor, F. Rose, C. Toher, O. Levy, K. Yang, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, S. Curtarolo, Computational Materials Science, 93, 178-192 (2014)
 S. Ong, S. Cholia, A. Jain, M. Brafman, D. Gunter, G. Ceder, K. Persson, Computational Materials Science, 97, 209-215 (2015)
 D. Papageorgiou, I. Kinloch, R. Young, Progress in Materials Science, 90, 75-127 (2017)
 C. Andersen, R. Armiento, E. Blokhin, G. Conduit, S. Dwaraknath, M. Evans, Á. Fekete, A. Gopakumar, S. Gražulis, A. Merkys, F. Mohamed, C. Oses, G. Pizzi, G. Rignanese, M. Scheidgen, L. Talirz, C. Toher, D. Winston, R. Aversa, K. Choudhary, P. Colinet, S. Curtarolo, D. Di Stefano, C. Draxl, S. Er, M. Esters, M. Fornari, M. Giantomassi, M. Govoni, G. Hautier, V. Hegde, M. Horton, P. Huck, G. Huhs, J. Hummelshøj, A. Kariryaa, B. Kozinsky, S. Kumbhar, M. Liu, N. Marzari, A. Morris, A. Mostofi, K. Persson, G. Petretto, T. Purcell, F. Ricci, F. Rose, M. Scheffler, D. Speckhard, M. Uhrin, A. Vaitkus, P. Villars, D. Waroquiers, C. Wolverton, M. Wu, X. Yang, Sci. Data., 8, 217 (2021)
 M. Evans, C. Andersen, S. Dwaraknath, M. Scheidgen, Á. Fekete, D. Winston, JOSS., 6, 3458 (2021)
- Informed public
- Registration required
- Rickard Armiento ( Linköping University , Sweden )
Gareth Conduit ( University of Cambridge , United Kingdom )
Saulius Gražulis ( Vilnius University Life Science Center Institute of Biotechnology , Lithuania )
Giovanni Pizzi ( PSI , Switzerland )
Gian-Marco Rignanese ( Université Catholique de Louvain , Belgium )
Markus Scheidgen ( Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin , Germany )
Cormac Toher ( Duke University , United States )
- Aude Merola-Faillétaz, CECAM Events & Communication Manager